“Roczniki Sztuki Śląskiej” / “Annals of Silesian Art”

RSS

Archive materials starting from vol. XXI
(lists of contents and summaries of Polish and foreign language articles) ➸
Archive materials from vol. I to XX (lists of contents) ➸
Instruction for the authors (in Polish) ➸
Reviewing procedure ➸
Contact ➸
Online Store ➸

ISSN 0557-2231

Editorial Committee:

dr hab. Andrzej Betlej, mgr Bożena Guldan-Klamecka (Editor in Chief), prof. dr hab. Łukasz Huculak, mgr Barbara Ilkosz, dr Romuald Nowak, dr hab. Piotr Oszczanowski, mgr Monika Raczyńska-Sędzikowska (Editorial Secretary), prof. dr hab. Rościsław Żerelik

Editorial Office Address:

Muzeum Narodowe we Wrocławiu
pl. Powstańców Warszawy 5
50-153 Wrocław
rss@mnwr.pl

Reviewers:

prof. zw. Andrzej P. Bator, Akademia Sztuk Pięknych we Wrocławiu
prof. dr hab. Krzysztof Chmielewski, Akademia Sztuk Pięknych w Warszawie
dr hab. Dorota Folga-Januszewska, prof. ASP, Akademia Sztuk Pięknych w Warszawie
dr hab. Hanna Grzeszczuk-Brendel, Politechnika Poznańska
dr hab. Paweł Gut, prof USz, Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Archiwum Państwowe w Szczecinie
dr Richard Hüttel, Museum der bildenden Künste, Lipsk
prof. dr hab. Grażyna Jurkowlaniec, Uniwersytet Warszawski
dr hab. inż. arch. Piotr Marciniak, prof. nadzw., Politechnika Poznańska
dr hab. Michał Mencfel, prof. UAM, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
prof. dr hab. Małgorzata Omilanowska-Kiljańczyk, Uniwersytet Gdański
prof. dr hab. Borys Paszkiewicz, Uniwersytet Wrocławski
prof. dr hab. Krzysztof Stefański, Uniwersytet Łódzki
prof. dr hab. Stanisław Marian Waltoś, Uniwersytet Jagielloński (profesor honorowy), członek PAN i PAU

Profile:

This periodical, starting from 1959, has been publishing texts which are the outcome of specialist research in the history of art in Silesia, from the earliest times to the modern day.
The publication contains discourses, miscellanea and texts dedicated to the collections and works of art held by the National Museum in Wrocław and the activities of this institution, as well as reviews and information related to the subject literature.

Contact:

Bożena Guldan-Klamecka
bozena.klamecka@mnwr.pl
bozena.klamecka@gmail.com

Monika Raczyńska-Sędzikowska
monika.sedzikowska@mnwr.pl

tel. +48 71 372 51 50 w. 263; 71 344 28 27

Archive material, starting from vol. XXI
(lists of contents and summaries of articles in Polish and other languages)

Roczniki Sztuki Śląskiej – archive (vol. I–XX)

Reviewing procedure

The procedure for reviewing articles published in academic periodicals as defined by the Annex to the Announcement of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education dated 14 September 2012 (based on § 14 Act 1 of the Directive of the Minister of Science and Higher Education dated 13 July 2012):
– in order to evaluate any publication, it is required to call for two independent reviewers not attached to the academic unit to which the author of the publication is linked,
– in the case of a foreign language publication, at least one of the reviewers is attached to an academic institution based abroad in a country other than the home country of the author,
– the author of the publication and its reviewers do not know each other’s names (the so-called double-blind review process), in other cases a reviewer is obliged to sign a declaration about the lack of the conflict of interests, whereas the conflict of interests signifies direct personal relations between the author and the reviewer […], relations of professional subordination or a direct academic cooperation during the last two years prior to the year of preparing the review,
– a review is in written form and contains an unequivocal proposal of the reviewer as to the admission for publishing or the rejection of the aforesaid article.

The principles of reviewing works proposed for publication in “Roczniki Sztuki Śląskiej” remain in accordance with the above listed regulations by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education. Detailed description of reviewing procedures are presented in the brochure on good practice in the academic review procedures [Dobre praktyki w procedurach recenzyjnych w nauce, Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego, Warszawa 2011] accessible on the MNiSW website.

On submitting an article for publication in “Roczniki Sztuki Śląskiej”, the author accepts the commencement of the reviewing procedure of the text.
Texts are reviewed by two independent reviewers not attached to the National Museum in Wrocław. In the case of foreign language texts, at least one of the reviewers has to be attached to an institution abroad, however on the assumption that the institution in question is based in a country other than the home country of the author of the publication. A list of the reviewers of the submitted works is published annually on the website of the periodical.
Reviewers have to hold an academic degree of at least PhD level, possess appropriate academic accomplishments and professional competences, as well as independence of judgement and unblemished reputation. It is inadmissible that circumstances should exist of any direct personal relations between an author and a reviewer, any relations of professional subordination, or any academic cooperation during the last two years prior to preparing the review, which constitute a conflict of interests.
The editors apply the principle of double-blind review, according to which the two sides remain mutually anonymous.
The editors, together with a full text of the submitted work, provide the reviewer with a review form (see Appendix 1.). The review must conclude with an unequivocal statement of admission or non-admission of the text for publication. Obtaining two positive reviews is a necessary condition for qualifying work for further stages of the publishing process.
The reviewers pass on the completed forms to the editors.
The comments of the reviewers are passed to the author of the reviewed text. He/she is obliged to take note of the expressed recommendations and alter the text accordingly.
The final decision about the admission of a text to print is taken by the Editor-in-Chief, on the basis of the opinions expressed by the reviewers and following consultation with the members of the editorial board of “Roczniki Sztuki Śląskiej”.
Reviewers are obliged to refrain from using the knowledge on the subject of the reviewed works prior to their publication.
Every submitted article is subject to editing.

EDITING REVIEW FORM ➸

↟ up